Our Environmental Remediation Consulting Services
ESE’s environmental remediation consulting covers the full process of evaluating, planning, and executing strategies to address soil, groundwater, and surface water contamination at impacted properties. Rather than defaulting to costly excavation, our remediation consultants first determine whether risk-based approaches, including institutional controls, engineering controls, or monitored natural attenuation, which relies on natural physical, chemical, and biological processes to reduce contaminant concentration, can achieve the same level of protection at a lower cost.
We conduct feasibility assessments, bench tests, and pilot tests before recommending any remedial method. That process protects our clients from unnecessary expenses and keeps projects on schedule.
Making Brownfields Green
Reclaim
ESE will assist with the acquisition of environmentally distressed infill sites. We will provide negotiating leverage for the buyer by identifying and quantifying environmental liabilities that can be used to discount the property.
Restore
reduce cost while achieving project goals. Every dollar saved through innovation is equity built
by our client.
Renew
Industries We Serve
Environmental contamination cuts across nearly every sector. Our regulatory remediation consulting work spans:
Government and public sector — Corrective action, federal/state voluntary cleanup programs, and compliance-driven closure
Real Estate and brownfields — Due diligence through redevelopment for investors, developers, and lenders
Energy and utilities — UST programs, upstream oil and gas sites, pipeline corridors, and power infrastructure
Construction and infrastructure — Pre-construction site clearance, soil management, and vapor intrusion control
Transportation — Right-of-way assessments, impacted soil management, and agency coordination for transit and highway projects
Why Choose ESE Partners for Remediation Consulting Services?
ESE Partners brings deep regulatory fluency and genuine technical depth to every project. We’ve managed corrective action under various remediation programs for decades, which means we know how to navigate the regulatory process efficiently and protect our clients from unnecessary cost or exposure.
A few things that set us apart:
Client-first cost strategy – We don’t recommend physical remediation when a risk-based solution achieves the same outcome. Our consultants exhaust every avenue to reduce client costs before committing to an approach.
Full-project continuity – Our team handles projects from Phase I and Phase II ESA through final closure reporting, with no handoffs between firms and no gaps in institutional knowledge.
Brownfield expertise – We’ve helped clients turn blighted, impacted properties into productive assets. Our Reclaim. Restore. Renew. approach transforms environmental liability into a real estate opportunity.
Texas roots, national reach – Headquartered in Texas with offices across the state, we operate with the responsiveness of a regional firm and the technical capacity of a national one.
Texas Firm with a
National Reach.
Discover featured projects from across ESE Partners’ disciplines: Due Diligence, Building Sciences, Remediation, Compliance, and Natural & Cultural Resources.
Contact Us
Frequently Asked Questions About Environmental Remediation Consulting
How long does the environmental remediation process typically take?
Timelines vary significantly based on the type and extent of contamination, the regulatory program governing the site, and the remedial approach selected. A straightforward UST corrective action case might close in 12 to 18 months, while a complex groundwater plume under active TCEQ oversight can take several years. Risk-based approaches that use institutional or engineering controls rather than physical cleanup often achieve regulatory closure faster than active remediation.
What’s the difference between risk-based corrective action and physical remediation?
Physical remediation involves actively removing or treating contaminants in soil, groundwater, or other media through excavation, chemical treatment, or extraction technologies. Risk-based corrective action takes a different path: rather than eliminating contamination, it evaluates the actual exposure risk to people under the site’s intended use and controls that risk through site restrictions, engineering barriers, or monitored natural attenuation. RBCA can be significantly less expensive and is often the preferred path under TCEQ and EPA voluntary cleanup programs.
Do we need a Phase II ESA before starting remediation?
In most cases, yes. A Phase II environmental site assessment establishes baseline data on the type, extent, and concentrations of contaminants present, information that’s essential for selecting a remedial approach, developing a response action plan, and engaging the applicable regulatory program. Attempting remediation without that data often leads to scope creep and cost overruns.